Andy Lyons - Getty Images
3 months ago: LEXINGTON, KY - FEBRUARY 18: Darius Miller #1 of the Kentucky Wildcats defends the shot of Terrance Henry #1 of the Ole Miss Rebels during the game at Rupp Arena on February 18, 2012 in Lexington, Kentucky. (Photo by Andy Lyons/Getty Images)
Click here for an explanation of how the DSS is charted and what the ratings and box score represent.
This was an odd game from a defensive perspective. For the game, the Kentucky Wildcats held the Ole Miss Rebels to 62 points on 66 possessions for a Defensive Efficiency of 93.9. That's not too far off their overall performance against the SEC entering the game (91.9 defensive efficiency) but the defensive effort was a bit uneven.
Early in the game the Cats were engaged, but even before Anthony Davis picked up his 2nd foul Ole Miss was starting to put together an effective offense behind the play of Terrence Henry. The Rebels executed against the press the Cats used against them to get some easy baskets and hit a few three points shots that were moderately contested, but mostly they were able to drive to the basket and get layups and dunks.
With Davis back on the floor for the second half, the Wildcats were back to their typically tough field goal defense as they held the Rebels to only 7 made shots and 15 total points in the first 12 minutes of the game. Once the Cats built a 20 point lead the defensive pressure relaxed somewhat although they didn't give up the kind of easy shots that South Carolina hit in the final minutes of the game at Columbia. Ole Miss hit 5 of their last 7 field goal attempts to make the score (and their FG%) look somewhat respectable, but by then the game was basically over.
On the good side, UK did a terrific job grabbing defensive rebounds and limiting 2nd chance opportunities. That helped counteract the worse-than-usual field goal defense. Everything else was pretty much what we've come to expect from the Cats this year.

| Kentucky | Defense Box Score: Kentucky vs Mississippi | ||||||||||||
| Name | Min | FGM | FGA | 3PTM | 3PTA | FTM | FTA | Def Rb | Blocks | TO | Steals | Points | Fouls |
| T. Jones | 30 | 5.5 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 2.5 | 1 | 11 | |
| M. Kidd-Gilchrist | 29 | 5.5 | 7.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2.33 | 2 | 13 | 2 |
| A. Davis | 25 | 4 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 1.33 | 1 | 11 | 2 |
| D. Lamb | 32 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1.5 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| M. Teague | 31 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 |
| D. Miller | 29 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1.34 | 2 | 8 | 2 |
| J. Polson | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| T. Beckham | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| E. Vargas | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| B. Long | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| K. Wiltjer | 19 | 1 | 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| Undefended | 40 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Totals | 200 | 25 | 53 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 22 | 6 | 12 | 7 | 62 | 12 |
| Kentucky | Four Factors | Ratings | |||||||||
| Name | Opp eFG% | Opp TO% | FTRate | DRb% | Stops | Scores | Plays | Stop% | DPoss% | Def Rtg | Opp Eff |
| K. Wiltjer | 22.2 | 22.3 | 0.0 | 7.8 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 4.5 | 0.78 | 0.14 | 86.7 | 44.7 |
| T. Jones | 50.0 | 19.9 | 0.0 | 24.7 | 7.1 | 5.5 | 12.6 | 0.56 | 0.25 | 91.6 | 87.4 |
| Undefended | 40.0 | 18.0 | 0.0 | 11.1 | 3.6 | 2.0 | 5.6 | 0.64 | 0.08 | 91.9 | 72.0 |
| M. Teague | 50.0 | 12.2 | 25.0 | 9.6 | 4.8 | 3.5 | 8.2 | 0.58 | 0.16 | 92.0 | 109.4 |
| D. Miller | 37.5 | 15.0 | 50.0 | 5.1 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 8.9 | 0.56 | 0.19 | 92.4 | 89.5 |
| D. Lamb | 100.0 | 55.5 | 0.0 | 4.6 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 0.63 | 0.05 | 92.8 | 74.0 |
| J. Polson | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 93.9 | 0.0 |
| T. Beckham | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 93.9 | 0.0 |
| B. Long | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 93.9 | 0.0 |
| A. Davis | 56.3 | 13.2 | 50.0 | 29.6 | 5.1 | 5.0 | 10.1 | 0.51 | 0.24 | 94.2 | 109.0 |
| M. Kidd-Gilchrist | 73.3 | 21.4 | 26.7 | 20.4 | 4.4 | 6.5 | 10.9 | 0.41 | 0.23 | 98.7 | 119.4 |
| E. Vargas | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0.29 | 122.7 | 210.5 |
| Totals | 50.0 | 18.2 | 26.4 | 81.5 | 35.1 | 29.3 | 64.4 | 0.55 | 93.9 | ||
0 recs | 7 comments
MKG
Kidd-Gilchrist seems to rise to the occasion in “big” games, i.e., Louisville, North Carolina, Florida. Vanderbilt was the exception. However, in other games, his performance doesn’t seem to be at the same level, like this one. I noticed that both he only got one foul (and Davis never fouled again) after the first half two fouls made him sit.
jdogblue - February 19, 2012
Maybe
I also submit that it is more likely that we remember performances in big games than if the same performance occurs against LSU or South Carolina. This wasn’t his best game to be sure, but I’m reluctant to connect that to the significance of the game.
JLeverenz - February 20, 2012
Did not think about the rebounds and limiting second chances...
…a very good point: they are the second best rebounding team in the conference, correct?
Dan Harris - February 19, 2012
they are
Which was really odd because it did not look to me like Ole Miss really went after their own missed shots. They seemed to be content to let a couple of guys stick around for rebounding while everyone else got back.
JLeverenz - February 20, 2012
Ole Miss
is an interesting study as a team. They have size. athletic ability, and have talent. They used their size to score in the paint against the Cats, once Davis sat.
They do not work hard on defense and this has been their downfall all season. UK ran their offense at will and we were quite efficient.
Once TJ, Darius, and Kyle figured out their defensive assignments, Ole Miss stopped scoring inside and, of course, Davis was back in the game he 2nd Half. Out rebounding the Rebs was a very positive sign. Their strength all season has been rebounding and we beat them at their own game.
We took Ole Miss’s best shot and scored a double-digit win. I don’t know what the heck is going on in Oxford, but, this Ole Miss team is much better than their record. This is a NCCAT team that will be going to the NIT….that is a shame because they “had” the potential for an outstanding season. Kennedy should be on the hot seast.
Go BIG Blue!!
seattlekat - February 20, 2012
I've seen them a couple of times now this season
And I think you are right. On paper they have a collection of talent and experience that you would think should lead to more success than it has.
JLeverenz - February 20, 2012
I Blame It On
Muslim taxi drivers.
Wild Weasel - February 20, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of A Sea Of Blue to post a comment.