SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

A Sea Of Blue

Kentucky Basketball: Saying What Needs To Be Said

As is my wont after a late Kentucky Wildcats game and staying up until 1:30 AM, I pretty much turned off my blogging for a while just to reclaim my thoughts from the madness of the night before and the emotion of a game that probably should register in the "L" column.

So when I finally got around to looking at something besides the comments to my own article of last night, I ran across the article Thayer Evans wrote for Fox Sports recycling some of the same old knocks on John Calipari you see everywhere. These three paragraphs encapsulate the entire tone, if not the detail of the piece, so if you are one of those people who don't want to give pageviews to sportswriters who draw your ire, don't click the link above and just read this:

But Calipari knows he was rather fortunate against a Mississippi State team that scored only four points in the final 6-1/2 minutes and is in danger of missing the NCAA tournament after losing four straight games. His team had been feasting on the waifish-weak Southeastern Conference and entered Tuesday with just the nation’s 47th-best strength of schedule.

So there’s still plenty of reason to doubt Kentucky, just like there always is with Calipari’s teams.

Because the knock on Calipari will remain the same until he finally wins his first NCAA championship: He can collect all the talent he wants, but inevitably underachieves with it because of his coaching shortcomings.

Two things need to be pointed out here when it comes to facts: first of all, the SEC is 3rd in the RPI in conference strength, and 4th in Ken Pomeroy's rankings. Calling the SEC "waifish-weak" is not a defensible opinion, and Evans even goes so far as to suggest Calipari is somehow coaching his players to always say the same thing about him when asked.

The second thing is that Mississippi St. only scored four points in 6-1/2 minutes because Kentucky locked them up like Charlie Manson with a basketball concept known as "defense," something Evans should familiarize himself with -- because apparently everyone but him knows the Wildcats are really good at this "defense" thing.

Star-divide

As to whether or not there is reason to doubt Kentucky, I couldn't agree more, but not because John Calipari is the coach. The problem with arguments like "Calipari has never won an NCAA tournament" is that the same thing could have been said about Mike Krzyzewski, Jim Calhoun, Jim Boeheim, and many other so-called "great" coaches for major portions of their career. It isn't as if Calipari has been coaching for 45 years, and he's only been at a school of the stature of Duke, UConn or Syracuse for 3 years now.

So when you see this, just realize that Calipari's naysayers are hanging on by a very thin thread that they all know is going to snap and drop them into the abyss of a Kentucky national title under Coach Cal, but they can't stand the thought and are hanging on for life and sanity. His "coaching shortcomings" are the same as those of the aforesaid legends before they won their first title, but Evans and his ilk want to make it somehow different because they are so invested in disliking Calipari. When that thread finally snaps, hopefully later this year, it will be most interesting to see them spin the loss of something so dear. Interesting, and a pleasure.

You may also be sure that I will relentlessly mock them when that thread does part. I haven't forgotten any of these slights, and their comments will come back to haunt them.


Storyend_dingbat_medium

Now, to the game. Contra Evans, who basically blames the MSU loss on the Bulldog's failure to score rather than Kentucky's incredible defense and change of defensive strategy by the "coaching shortcomings" of Calipari to put Michael Kidd-Gilchrist on Dee Bost, this was a stirring comeback for the Wildcats. The problem is, Kentucky shouldn't have been there in the first place.

What was disappointing about this game, and it cannot be minimized by the impressive second half, was Kentucky's failure to fire in the first half. It wasn't just that they were cold, they were shooting quick challenged shots, and their defense was about as intense as Sean Penn rolling out of his marijuana smoke-filled van in Fast Times at Ridgemont High. Now, one single half of basketball doesn't make a trend, and if this was the first time we'd seen that, I don't think I'd have much to say about it. But the first half of the MSU game looked unpleasantly familiar.

In fact we just saw something very similar Saturday against Ole Miss. It was the same thing -- quick, challenged shots and inadequate defensive intensity leading to a deficit against an inferior team. The fact that the turnaround was quicker speaks more to the relative talents of the two opposing teams and the game venue than anything else.

One lapse out of many quarters is an anomaly, but two in two games makes me concerned. This team may well be reading their own press clippings, and if so, they are setting themselves up for a loss. Coach Cal clearly needs to refocus these guys, and while it is impressive that they put the clamps on MSU for half after making a mess of the first 20 minutes, repeating that in the NCAA tournament where the stakes are so much higher is a recipe for giving Thayer Evans his dearest wish.

So while I am pleased with the outcome, I am most displeased with the process, and you should be, also. This team can no longer afford the luxury of the "they are just young" excuse. That time has passed. If this Kentucky team is truly to ascend to the pinnacle of the college basketball world it's time to put aside childish things, like the youth excuse, and forget about them. A team that plays "young" is not going to win the NCAA Tournament -- it never has and it never will. So let's leave that excuse right here for the rest of the year.

Let this game serve as a lesson and a warning of what can still happen, and at a more meaningful time. Yes, the victory was impressive as comebacks go. It is also a reminder that one mental lapse can end your season prematurely, and the time for "one-and-done" is near, and I'm not speaking of the NBA draft.

Hopefully, that lesson won't be missed, but learned well.

0 recs  |  77 comments

Comments

What UK team has been in sync at the Hump lately?

We still have a lot of youth on this team and MSU has been a tough place to play at for a long time. I agree that we were too amped at the beginning of the game. Last year’s team would have folded under these conditions and they turned out pretty well. MKG on Bost from the start and we would have won by twenty. This team is special and like Bilas says, “it’s like looking for warts on a supermodel”.

Cal said he made a mistake

by not putting MKG on Bost to start the game. Cal said he wanted to use the press (they had been working on it this week) and MKG on Bost was not consistent with that. He is a coach who recognizes his own mistakes and makes changes. I like that.

Cal says he is coaching their minds now, nothing else. They are not machines and boredom is a factor. Other teams are playing for their tourny lives right now.
I agree with all your points, and feel the same way...

however, would this article be up if that same game style was played in a NC, with the same outcome? :)

Evans name goes on the list with all the others,

who are going to be eating crow in about 5 weeks

Yeah, you just read that stuff and file it away because it's going to be sweet to watch them eat their words

(Actually, they won’t eat their words; they’ll wonder when the win will be vacated, etc) Twenty years down the road they’ll talk about what an innovator he was, etc.

Finally...

Glenn,
Without the hyperbole of many, you have hit the nail on Jimmy Dykes head!
Winning is great and this team can be great. But a great team does not repeat – but learns from its mistakes. Youth takes time to learn – but we are not in November anymore!
I have a queeziness about this team’s swagger. Nothing great was ever accomplished easily – and winning seems to be easy for them, now.
Maybe I’m a worrier – but I want these guys to WIN IT and shut these ne’er-do-wells up that keep bringing all this ran on the (hopeful) parade.
Keep up your great insight!

We're UK fans, we always have that "queeziness"

Otherwise we’d be Carolina fans. I’ve seen a few UK championship teams and it’s never been easy. Keep the faith, these guys are special.

'96 was pretty queezy-free

…but not so with this team or any of the others. I’m still scarred from Joe B. taking his starters out in the 1978 championship game and watching Duke make a run at the end.

Moved to KY in 1974 from..

TEXAS… been to 78 UK home games at the “Shrine” Rupp… and there never was a queeyness about "96 because those guys were mostly all upperclassmen… Once they lost to umass.. they forgot about the undefeated season and just wanted to crush every team they played. Having seen all of the “good or very good” UK teams since then, at least once, this team probably could give ‘96 a run for their money. Don’t know whether they would win or not, but, the winner would know they had been in a real “Cat Fight”!

I'd have to go

with ’96

I think this team is close to 96.

I don’t remember the Runts. Issel/Pratt/Casey were the first teams I really remember, 78 was something special, my Frosh year at school. The mid to late 90’s were the rebirth. All good.

But 96 or 97 is close. 97 was such a good team, if Anderson had been healthy all year……..

There’s years that are special; this is one methinks.

sweasyf

We should have hung #7 in 1997. All Pitino had to do was play the best defensive player in the country for 8-10 minutes at the end. There would have been no OT. We would have won straight up.

I believe I know why but will not comment here. Let it suffice to say that a major part of it was Lute Olson.

FOXTRAIL

I agree except for the SEC championship game in ‘96. In my opinion RP gave that one away. Why I don’t know. But it was obvious to me.

MSU.........

Don’t know if rp gave it away… but, msu was pretty good that year to make it to the ff.. Sure would hope uf would make it this year… if they can get out of the 2nd round

I guess I'm different

Hindsight is great. But I remember being “queezy” before several of the games in the 1996 tourney, especially after witnessing first hand the loss to Miss. St. in the SECT championship. I was nervous about Wake with the great Tim Duncan, nervous about the rematch with UMass, and nervous about Syracuse. And I was at those last two games.

Dog

I’m queezy about almost every game. I was courtside at the GREAT 8 loss to Umass and I was damned queezy for the rematch.

Agree about UMass

I was very nervous about that one.

We are the same jdog. I was on edge that entire tournament.

I remember RP commenting that he was Calapari’s mentor and hadn’t tought him all of his tricks. I recall UMASS players saying they had beat us once already and they were going to do it again. They were so sure of themselves and thank heavens we pulled it out. That was a very, very long tournament for me.

I'm pretty sure

it wasn’t the NC game, I’m thinkin Florida st that he did that

No, it was the NC game. He had a double digit lead with a couple of minutes left

and pulled the starters to the cheers of the many UK fans present. At that point in time Duke scored two or three quick baskets and Joe B. had to get the starters back in to finish the job.

ok

the game I have in mind was like the 2nd or 3rd round, didnt start the starters for the 2nd half

because they were playin so poorly
Special yes - still doesn't take away queeziness

I remember runnning up my back door in ’78 after the win as a very young man – they were special – but I was queezy. I also remember the ’75 game against UCLA – special team – but queezy. Even with the talent we had then and now – the one loss and your done NCAA is great because of queeziness!
I am keeping the faith – but as mentioned – I am queezy because I care and bleed real blue!!!

Evans has...

…that same self-righteous tone that so many sports writers adopt when trying to justify their prejudices. Its not rational, it can’t be proven, yet it must be true. And if you disagree you must be wrong.

The very thing that drives you crazy is also the thing that makes others read his articles. Unfortunate but true. Some people are haters.

On the other hand, Duke just sucks. Any rational person can surely see that, right?

The same can be said of fans too....
…that same self-righteous tone that so many sports writers adopt when trying to justify their prejudices. Its not rational, it can’t be proven, yet it must be true. And if you disagree you must be wrong.

I don’t agree that Duke “sucks” but I do not think they are one of the 5 best teams either.

Duke does Suck!

I hope you recognize a tongue planted firmly in cheek :)

-k

It was a good post

sad you had to explain…“you must be wrong” and “any rational person can see that, right?” were clear indicators of tongue in cheek ;j

Texas fans...

…are well aware of the “impartial” “writing” of one Thayer Evans and the blowhardedness behind it.

All I can say is, don’t feed the troll.

I agree there's some reason to be concerned

I was surprised at the half-assedness they played with against Ole Miss. I’m at a loss to explain why they were so slow out of the gates against MSU. However, I think the difference between these two games is that this one probably got their attention. State got in their face, made some shots, and absolutely could have won this game, whereas Ole Miss didn’t really have a chance. I have a feeling Calipari’s gonna get that message across in practice the rest of this week and we’ll see an execution clinic on Saturday against Vanderbilt. Go Cats.

I think you're right

This team was due for a firm-handed basketball spanking, and they got it in the first half against MSU. I hope the last 10 minutes against MSU shows what this team will do going forward.

My opinion based on 64 years of following UK BB is that when a team starts 2 sophmores and 3 freshmen, that is young, young, young. The freshmen having never played at places like Vandy, MSU, etc. are going to be about a breath away from being rattled. Even AD looked awkward at first.

Back when UK had to play in the old Vandy "Crackerbox and “Alligator Alley” in Fl., even our juniors and seniors would oftentimes get rattled.
The Wildcats on Tuesday gave a great account of themselves against yet another experienced team on the road.

Bad first half and all, I’ll take it.

Pretty interesting piece that is sure to raise a few eyebrows....

Luke Winn, SI.com: Magic Eight possible national champions

I thought this line towards the bottom was funny..

YOUR YET-TO-BE-MENTIONED TEAM. Your feelings are hurt. SI is biased and the concept of this column is stupid, anyway. You’re going to post this on your message board.
Great post and phenomenal insight

For pondering, how much rope did Cal give the team in the first half last night? If he did let them experiment, was there a purpose to it?

Yes, there was

Winning during tourney time takes deep thinking from the team, not just the coach. The experiment worked, in my opinion. They have to think, he has to point them in the right direction. They are young, but sometimes if you get them to think in the right direction, youth and talent will prevail. Especially if you allow them to find maturity.

I remember Cal letting one of his previous teams

run their own practice and he left. He took back over rather quickly when they failed to step up to the responsibility he gave them. He tested this team last night and they won but showed how much more they still have to learn.

My thoughts

I have been a UK fan all my life…50 years and counting….and it’s always the same. Kentucky cheats. Kentucky’s fans expect too much. And now with Cal it’s he cheats plus he can’t win a title. I am used to it. Yeah I get angry and upset with it…which is why I seldom read that trash. It’s like a badge of honor to me. Most college basketball fans hate UK and there is a anti-UK bias within the media. It all gives them something to talk about and blog about. UK has a great chance to win it all this year but if they don’t many will say “Cal can’t win it all” or “Cal can’t win with freshman”. There will also be some Cat fans saying the same thing. I can remember many saying in the 1990’s about a certain UK coach that he couldn’t win it all either.

As far as the game last night I wasn’t disappointed in the least. Yes they could have played better but what I saw was a GREAT comeback. And even if it’s late Feb. they still make freshman mistakes which is what makes last night comeback even better. I just keep telling myself something I have heard Cal say:“Enjoy the wins folks.”

One tiny exception with your post...

..when you state:

Most college basketball fans hate UK

there are many vocal fanatics for whom that is true, just as there those among BBN who have an unreasoning hatred of UL and other schools, and a perhaps more reasoned hatred of Duke (of which I am probably guilty myself) and many of these are rabid posters, which make their ranks appear larger than they are. A great many fans support their team, and yet can admire the skills of other teams, except when displayed against them. Some of these fans are only too happy to talk to me about UK BB ( I live in an area near Michigan, and they are concerned with their rivals: UM vs. M State vs. OSU) and even open to see that the press about Calipari might be wrong.
As to:
and there is a anti-UK bias within the media

there is that in certain parts, just as there are media admirers. Some how we read the admirers and think that is just as it should and move on, but the ‘nay-sayers’, oh they rankle and we remember them. And they know all they have to do is run down UK and sthey will get a bunch of hits as the ‘haters’ shout AMEN! and BBN picks apart the argument or sometimes just yells “NO!” But it gets them numbers. I forget which site it was on, but last March I saw the posting numbers broken down by “tags”. UK had almost the same # of posts as the NCAA tourney, and more than any other team by a wide margin.

It is truly amazing to me how many people still operate under that misconception that the only way to build up their team is to tear down the others. Hopefully this Spring will see us cutting down the nets and ending that “criticism”, but don’t expect it to quiet the critics, they’ll just go to another argument. LOL

On to New Orleans!

The further we advance in the tournament

the more haters we will accumulate. Their teams will be gone and the only thing left for them is to pull for another team to beat the teams they love to hate. When we win it all, we can rejoice in the fact that we spoiled so many people’s season. :)

kywmn

Correct. And we can cosole ourselves with the fact that all of their cheering against us will not change the outcome of one single game.

As you say, rooting for the others is all they have. Big Blue we love you.

Sports writers!

Love ‘em or hate ’em, they can offer informed opinions. The Cal haters (and he seems to attract quite a few) will only be quieted by a Championship. In the mean time, UK has benefited from hiring Cal and we just need to let them have their say. I think we are all glad Cal is our coach.
As for the team, it’s easy to see how they might be over-confident at this point and Cals seems very aware. No doubt, this year’s team is scarry good and playing like a team. My biggest worry about the ncaa tourney is coming up against a team that is very hot one night. Last night’s close call may be just the kind of learning experience the Cats need to get them thru that kind of adversity.
In the mean time, what a ride!

BarryM

Sorry, but that won’t quiet them either. If 10 National Championships haven’t quieted them neither will #8. I’ve said this before and I’ll repeat it.

It all started between 1930-1940 when it became obvious that UK had pulled off a coup when they hired Adolph Rupp. The eye opening success that he was having did not set well with the north eastern news media.
Neither has the success of the coaches who have followed him.

Agree with me or not, from 1948 to the present, I have witnessed the bias against a school that only wants to win. And win they did, do and will continue to do in the future. The Cats are the greatest!

In my opinion no win belongs in the loss column by any team. After a team plays as bad as UK in the first half, then comes back to win on the road, deserves everything they get.

MSU is not a pushover. If it weren’t for Renardo Sydney’s lack of involvement, this team wouldn’t have the difficulty and the losses they have.

If Sidney played halfway to his stature

Miss St would be in the top 10 this year. The man could work for WWE, except he is too lazy for the Wrestling business.

It's not that they are young, it's called complacency

I’m with you Glenn. But I think Coach Cal has got to figure out how to light a fire in their ass at the start of games, not at the half. It is not just the last two games. If we go back to early in the season, we were all making the same comments about how the Wildcats were a 2d half team. Somehow, I don’t think that is going to work in the NCAA Tourney. It didn’t work against Indiana and if MSU had a front court with more reliability (yes, I am referring to our favorite Baby Huey), we would not have been able to blow by them at the end.

Here’s the deal, other teams now have a blueprint…if they have the interior presence to pull it off…and now I am specifically referring to Syracuse or Ohio State (anybody else???). I suppose you could add UNC and maybe Michigan State.

Guess we are gonna lose it all then. Worthless laggards.
Wow, you're really good at reading between the lines

Funny, though, I didn’t know that I was cashing in the season.

Well read your own post again,

sure doesn’t sound like you think we are going to have a successful post season run.

As I Recall

Cats jumped out on Ole Miss 16-5.

wingke6

You’re right about other teams knowing how we want to play. But, Cal has more tricks up his sleeve than a side show magician.

We must consider that this man coached in the NBA. He is very intelligent and his time in the NBA was not in vain. As many of our opponents in the last three years will testify.

Part of the Cal/UK hatred is based on exactly that. He’s smart.

There has to be a basis for complacency. That basis is experience. How can one be complacent with no primal reference? There must be something for comparison. What would it be, other than “been there and done that?”

Just had a thought. We are ASoB aka “Logan’s Heroes.” LOL

Actually ASoB was first Bogans' Heroes.

Link here.

mike. D

For the first time I disagree Glenn. Wow that sounded weird lol. I just think there is nothing to worry about. I have heard from the start of SEC play that Mississippi State is the team that could best matchup with Kentucky. Games like this are going to happen. Its all about how you react and we all seen our team respond to the challenge like they have all year.. There chemistry is amazing. I see how special this team is. I mean truly special. We got more out of that game than any other.

I think we again showed the rest of the country that if your going to beat UK then you better make every shot and hope NO ONE on our team is playing well. And even then they will have trouble. Miss State is a talented tournament team that was playing out of there minds. The crowd was crazy. We went in at halftime and came out a different team. We grew even more. It seems like no matter what you throw at this team, they come back and keep coming back. They never panicked which is amazing. Now crowd will be like that in the tournament. As we all know there is no such thing as a neutral court when UK is playing. I still love you work though Glenn lol

People disagree with me all the time ...

… and I don’t mind at all.

This team is capable of much better than what we saw at MSU, in my opinion. Yes, it was a nice comeback, but it was made necessary by very bad play in the first half. There was no excuse for that. As Calipari himself said, Kentucky was not competing at all.

They did something very similar vs. Ole Miss, they just started out well and then started doing the same thing they did at MSU — quick, challenged shots, no heart, unwilling to compete. You may disagree with me about what it means — and I freely admit I could be wrong about that part — but you can’t disagree with the fact that these things did happen, because they did.

Sometimes I look at how many timeouts Cal needs in a game to gage how the team played.
By the way, I think 18 potential timeouts in one game needs to be changed.

The teams get 5 each, 8 TV. Too many for a 40 minute game. If you have this many, then have 30 second posessions like the ladys, or 24 like the pros.

No way. Those pros are the creame de la creme. Sometimes these college kids are doing good to get a shot off in 35 seconds.

Interesting Experience Watching the Game

Had the game DVR’d and just watched it for the first time last night. It was an interesting experience after hearing all the commentary and Coach’s comments after the game. It’s kinda fun knowing why a player is sitting the bench while the announcers are speculating. Knowing that a player is going to get hot at a particular point in the game has a satisfying appeal.

Strangely enough, it doesn’t take away from the tension of being down and seeing the Cats being soundly thrashed early on.

-k

Your point please.

That was unnecessary

I thought it was at least a mildly amusing comment.

Ain’t following you. The trail must have been washed out.

You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of A Sea Of Blue to post a comment.